(978) 979-1223

ccobb@silverlakelegal.com

Silver Lake Legal

Construction, Insurance & Business Attorney Boston

Interesting Questions Deflected by Local Court to be Decided by Forum Identified in Agreement




PARTIES AND FACTS

Wegmans grocery store was constructing a store in Burlington Massachusetts. It hired two companies to work on the project.

Aerotek contracted with Wegmans that Aerotek would supply employees to provide construction supervision. Story was such an employee, hired to serve as construction foreman. As part of that agreement, Aerotek agreed to add Wegmans as an additional insured on Aerotek’s general liability coverage and to defend and indemnify Wegmans from claims related to the services.

WP Masonry contracted with Wegmans to perform masonry on the job. WP Masonry’s employee Holguin was injured when a scaffold collapsed. WP Masonry had agreed to include Wegmans as additional insured on the WP Masonry general liability policy and to defend and indemnify Wegmans from claims arising out of the WP Masonry work.

The injured employee sued Wegmans and Aerotek and Aerotek’s foreman Story in Massachusetts State Court. WP Masonry’s general liability insurer Fireman’s Fund paid to defend Wegmans.

Fireman’s Fund started a new Federal case asking the judge to make declarations about the duties under the insurance agreements. Fireman’s Fund asked the judge to declare that Aerotek or its employee or its insurer were at least partially liable with WP Masonry’s insurer Fireman’s Fund.

Agreements between Wegmans and both WP Masonry and Aerotek had “forum selection” clauses. All disputes arising out of the the services or related to the contract were to be brought in the Western District of New York.

ISSUE

Should the Massachusetts Federal judge interpret contract details of agreements that provided all cases from the agreements should be brought elsewhere.

HOLDING

No need to go beyond the valid forum selection agreement.

REASONS

The agreements included a section describing where disputes were to be brought – the Massachusetts court sent the parties to New York for interpretations of those agreements.

COMMENT

If you agree to fight somewhere else, don’t be surprised if a local judge sends you there.

Get A Consult

Charles W. Cobb

Attorney at Law


ADDRESS

320 Nevada Street Ste 301,

Newton MA 02460

EMAIL

ccobb@silverlakelegal.com

PHONE NUMBER

(978) 979-1223

Silver Lake Legal Privacy Policy

This site was created using WordPress and uses Google Analytics to understand how posts are being received.

• This site has Google Analytics Advertising Features implemented involving Google Analytics cookies.

• Some of the ads you receive on pages across the internet are customized based on predictions about your interests generated from your visits over time and across different web-sites. This type of ad customization — sometimes called “interest-based” or “online behavioral” advertising — is enabled through various technologies, including browser cookies as well as other non-cookie technologies.

• Sliver Lake Legal has no policy or intent to use first and third party cookies together.

• Visitors can opt-out of the Google Analytics Advertising Features, including through Ads Settings, Ad Settings for mobile apps, or any other available means (for example, the NAI’s consumer opt-out).

• Users should also visit Google Analytics’ currently available opt-outs for the web.