(978) 979-1223


Silver Lake Legal

Construction, Insurance & Business Attorney Boston

Insurer Not Stuck With Parties’ Settlement, Arguing That Since Death Was Not Accident, Claim Was Not Covered

Massachusetts’ top Court laid out the process for insurers to show they should not have to pay for a voluntary settlement reached by parties covered by insurance.

With personal injury insurance you get a legal defense paid for by the carrier as long as covered claims are asserted and you get indemnity.  This Massachusetts case describes what happens when some claims are covered but some are excluded, when the carrier reserves its right to challenge coverage but then the parties settle without the insurer. Commerce Insurance Co. v. Szafarowicz (SJC 2019)


Son drove his father’s well-insured car right into someone, killing them. Son plead to the crime of manslaughter.  Victim’s family sued for tort compensation claiming the driver was grossly negligent.

Insurers have to defend negligence allegations but this insurer opened another case claiming the act was intentional and therefore not covered by insurance.  As civil case against the driver went forward the insurer asked a judge to decide the coverage matter first but the Court declined.  The civil case settled with an “admission” of negligence by the driver, a finding of big damages (>$5M) and an assignment of the rights of the driver against the insurer for the proceeds of the big policy. Interest piled up on the unpaid judgment while the coverage case went on.   The insurer objected to this settlement.

Meanwhile, the judge in the coverage case held a hearing and determined the conduct was intentional and not covered.   


How should Court treat a voluntary settlement opposed by the insurer which agreement seemed aimed at reaching coverage?


Court has to look into whether the settlement was legitimate or simply structured to grab insurance proceeds.


Settlement of a case arising from what may have been an intentional act, needs to be examined so insurers don’t get stuck paying for conduct that is not insurable.  Massachusetts top Court said trial judges need to make sure the case wasn’t underlitigagted just to reach coverage. Courts reviewing questioned settlements need to make sure they are reasonable.

If your insurer issues a “reservation of rights” you should call a lawyer who understands insurance.

Get A Consult

Charles W. Cobb

Attorney at Law


320 Nevada Street Ste 301,

Newton MA 02460




(978) 979-1223

Silver Lake Legal Privacy Policy

This site was created using WordPress and uses Google Analytics to understand how posts are being received.

• This site has Google Analytics Advertising Features implemented involving Google Analytics cookies.

• Some of the ads you receive on pages across the internet are customized based on predictions about your interests generated from your visits over time and across different web-sites. This type of ad customization — sometimes called “interest-based” or “online behavioral” advertising — is enabled through various technologies, including browser cookies as well as other non-cookie technologies.

• Sliver Lake Legal has no policy or intent to use first and third party cookies together.

• Visitors can opt-out of the Google Analytics Advertising Features, including through Ads Settings, Ad Settings for mobile apps, or any other available means (for example, the NAI’s consumer opt-out).

• Users should also visit Google Analytics’ currently available opt-outs for the web.