(978) 979-1223


Silver Lake Legal

Construction, Insurance & Business Attorney Boston

Court Tags Insurer with Entire Judgment Despite Lack of Notice of Suit

An insurer with enough notice of a claim had to pay the full damage

even though the policy holder never turned over suit papers

– because the insurer didn’t really suffer prejudice

the top Massachusetts court ruled in a recent case.

FACTS C&N ran a car repair shop and carried General Liability insurance with $50k limits of coverage. Boyle was badly hurt when a tire exploded in the shop. He lost a year of work, had permanent hand limitations and incurred $100k in medical bills.

C&N reported the incident to its insurer Zurich, who opened an investigation and learned of the injuries. Boyle’s lawyer wrote to Zurich demanding to know the policy limits – which insurers must disclose by law in Massachusetts and which Zurich failed to do. Boyle sued C&N who didn’t turn the papers over to Zurich.

Zurich determined this was a covered loss and that liability was clear; then… Zurich closed its file. (?!)

When no answer was filed by C&N, it was defaulted. Boyle’s lawyer sent Zurich notice of the default and copies of the medical bills. Zurich had the bills scanned to the closed file but took no other action. Judgment entered against C&N for $2.25M.

Boyle sued Zurich saying they were 3rd party beneficiaries meant to benefit from the insurance agreement between C&N and Zurich. Boyle also got C&N to assign its rights against its insurer Zurich, to Boyle.

The case based on C&N’s assigned rights against Zurich went to trial. The judge decided Zurich had a duty to defend its policy holder and should have tried to settle for the policy limits. Boyle’s lawyer said he’d have accepted the $50k and not pressed on if it had been offered.

ISSUE  Since its insured didn’t forward suit papers, did Zurich have any duty to defend?

HOLDING  Zurich had a duty to defend C&N.

REASONS  The duty to settle promptly arises when liability becomes clear. Zurich was on notice this claim was coming and suffered no prejudice from the failure of the insured to give over suit papers.

COBB COMMENT Courts want to force insurers to act and to punish those who don’t; this insurer had enough notice to prompt a response. Unresponsive insurers drag out cases that should be resolved.

Get A Consult

Charles W. Cobb

Attorney at Law


320 Nevada Street Ste 301,

Newton MA 02460




(978) 979-1223

Silver Lake Legal Privacy Policy

This site was created using WordPress and uses Google Analytics to understand how posts are being received.

• This site has Google Analytics Advertising Features implemented involving Google Analytics cookies.

• Some of the ads you receive on pages across the internet are customized based on predictions about your interests generated from your visits over time and across different web-sites. This type of ad customization — sometimes called “interest-based” or “online behavioral” advertising — is enabled through various technologies, including browser cookies as well as other non-cookie technologies.

• Sliver Lake Legal has no policy or intent to use first and third party cookies together.

• Visitors can opt-out of the Google Analytics Advertising Features, including through Ads Settings, Ad Settings for mobile apps, or any other available means (for example, the NAI’s consumer opt-out).

• Users should also visit Google Analytics’ currently available opt-outs for the web.