(978) 979-1223


Silver Lake Legal

Construction, Insurance & Business Attorney Boston

Another Massachusetts Wage Act Case – Agency That Issued Paychecks as Intermediary Only – is not Employer

A personal care attendant provided care for an elderly consumer paid for by Mass Health (Medicaid).  The pay checks were issued by an agency CPM.  The case name is Gallagher v Cerebral Palsy of Massachusetts and was decided by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in September 2017.

The care giver sued the CPM agency with claims for unpaid overtime and violations of the Massachusetts Wage Act. Many cases determine someone’s status as an employer or not, by looking at the “right to control the details of performance’.

Under the special rules of the Massachusetts Wage Act MGL c 149 § 148 and Overtime Law MGL c 151 § 1 A,  determining employee status, starts with two questions 1) did the worker provide services for the claimed employer? And if so, 2) can the employer show all three of these?

  • The worker is free from the employer’s actual control and direction; AND

  • The worker performs a service that is “outside the usual course of business of the employer”; AND

  • The worker is “customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed”.

The Appeals Court decided the agency CPM was just a “fiscal intermediary” acting as a conduit for Mass Health funds according to a complex regulatory framework; those regulations explicitly say that agents like CPM are not responsible for hours in excess of those allowed.

The Appeals Court ruled that CPM was doing what regulations required, that it was not set up to get around the wage paying obligations of employers and that finally, under the first question for Wage Act cases – because the personal care attendant did not provide services for CPM the agency, there was no employee employer relationship between the two.

Comment – the increasing number of wage claims reflects a divide in society. I expect to see more rules imposed on employers to better the situation of workers.  Wage Act cases can reward workers and punish employers.

Get A Consult

Charles W. Cobb

Attorney at Law


320 Nevada Street Ste 301,

Newton MA 02460




(978) 979-1223

Silver Lake Legal Privacy Policy

This site was created using WordPress and uses Google Analytics to understand how posts are being received.

• This site has Google Analytics Advertising Features implemented involving Google Analytics cookies.

• Some of the ads you receive on pages across the internet are customized based on predictions about your interests generated from your visits over time and across different web-sites. This type of ad customization — sometimes called “interest-based” or “online behavioral” advertising — is enabled through various technologies, including browser cookies as well as other non-cookie technologies.

• Sliver Lake Legal has no policy or intent to use first and third party cookies together.

• Visitors can opt-out of the Google Analytics Advertising Features, including through Ads Settings, Ad Settings for mobile apps, or any other available means (for example, the NAI’s consumer opt-out).

• Users should also visit Google Analytics’ currently available opt-outs for the web.